This paper explores how South Korea's 2007-2010 immigration reforms, shifting ethnic Korean Chinese (EKC) women away from marriage, altered intra-household bargaining by constraining men's marriage market options. Employing a triple difference-in-differences strategy with district-level variation in sex ratios and EKC bride presence, we analyze rich individual-level longitudinal data and divorce records. We find that the reform significantly increased women's intra-household bargaining power. This shift is associated with reduced housework, higher employment, improved life satisfaction, and lower divorce rates, with a rise in abuse-related cases. These results reveal immigration policy's unintended effects on household dynamics and its broader economic implications.
We study the impacts of childbirth on maternal mental health, the role of pro-natalist cash transfers in shaping maternal health, and fertility consequences of maternal mental health. Using claims-level data from South Korea's universal healthcare system, we find that diagnoses of mental health conditions increase by approximately 80-163% following the first and second births. However, we observe little evidence that pro-natalist cash transfers mitigate these adverse mental health effects. As possible mechanisms, we find that the adverse mental health effects are greater among high-income families whose spending for child-rearing measured by expenditure for education are greater than low-income families. Child penalties in the labor market do not explain our results. Lastly, we find that experiencing poor mental health after childbirth is negatively associated with the likelihood of having an additional child. Overall, our findings offer new insights into the interplay among motherhood penalties, pro-natalist cash transfers, and fertility.
I present novel causal evidence on the effects of pro-natalist cash transfers in South Korea on fertility, the sex ratio at birth, and infant health. I exploit rich spatial and temporal variation in pro-natalist cash transfers and the universe of birth, death, and migrant registry records. The total fertility rate in 2015 would have been 4.7% lower without the cash transfers. Surprisingly, the cash transfers had the unintended consequence of correcting the unnaturally male-skewed sex ratio and lowering gestational age and birth weight. Negative selection into childbearing may explain these effects.
In this paper, we exploit a series of the relocation of public-sector entities in South Korea as an exogenous source of variation in public sector employment to estimate local employment multiplier. We find that an introduction of 1 public sector employment increases the private sector employment by 1 unit, almost completely driven by the service sector. In line with the literature, we document that the effect of public employment on private employment is highly localized. In addition to changes in private employment, we also find that the relocation led to a positive net-inflow of residents into the treated neighborhood; this effect is also localized. Lastly, we estimate heterogeneous local employment multiplier and provide evidence that this heterogeneity is shaped by the size of public sector shocks, different types of relocation, and the extent of migratory responses.
This chapter reviews the literature on the causal effects of policies on fertility. It focuses on evidence from experiments and quasi-experiments in low fertility contexts, including studies from Europe, Northern America, Oceania, and Asia. Making no a priori restrictions on policy type, the review encompasses evaluations of parental leave, childcare, health insurance, and financial incentives such as child transfers. Childcare expansions increase completed fertility. Financial incentives had positive effects on fertility across contexts, both in the short and long run. Expansions of parental leave rights in Central Europe and the introduction of parental leave in the U.S. also had positive effects. The distributional effects of these policies are very different, with parental leave compensation benefiting high-earning couples, while expansions of childcare programs had potential to reduce social inequalities. Publicly funded contraception and assisted reproduction can reduce fertility in young adulthood and increase fertility for women over the age of 35.
We study optimal dynamic lockdowns against Covid-19 within a commuting network. Our framework integrates canonical spatial epidemiology and trade models, and is applied to cities with varying initial viral spread: Seoul, Daegu and NYC-Metro. Spatial lockdowns achieve substantially smaller income losses than uniform lockdowns, and are not easily approximated by simple centrality-based rules. In NYM and Daegu—with large initial shocks—the optimal lockdown restricts inflows to central districts before gradual relaxation, while in Seoul it imposes low temporal but large spatial variation. Actual commuting responses were too weak in central locations in Daegu and NYM, and too strong across Seoul.
"Radicalized by Local News Broadcasting? How Partisan Media Affects Hate Crimes in the United States" (with Jun Luo and Brett McCully)
"Gains from Transportation Infrastructure Improvement" (with Minje Cho and Matthew Shapiro)
"Spatial and Economic Mobility and Universities" (with Fernanda da Silva and Nathenial Pattison)
"Dynamics of Fertility and Social Norm" (with Jisub Shin and Michael Sposi)
"Fiscal Multipliers, Geography, and Consumption Network" (with Simon Fuchs, Rocio Madera, and Hoyoung Yoo)